Why Men Matter
Epigraph
‘Man is the measure of all things’
– Protagoras
At the time of writing this, the COP26 global climate change conference involving the United Nations had just come to an end. The conference which has been going around for 26 years, brings together world leaders, activists, and other important stakeholders; who use this opportunity to debate policies and measures on preventing and/or combating environmental disasters that are set to engulf the world thanks to anthropogenic climate change. Drive primarily by (so it seems) by the emission of Co2 over the past few centuries, but particularly in the recent decades. The business of fighting climate change has been going on for a while.
My knowledge of the subject is not extensive, though I did write a number of essays on the subject and on topics related to it during my time at University. What I did find interesting about this almost 2 week-long event was the pageantry that accompanied it, both inside and outside, which was aided by the presence of members from the royal family (the Queen was supposed to make it but couldn’t attend). Along with the unmissable Greta Thunberg, who was not invited, and is arguably the most recognizable face of the modern climate change movement; who this year graduated to adulthood.
Speaking of Great Thunberg, the adult, it is also worth mentioning that she is female. And as it happened so were the many of the talking heads of a number of the climate-related discussions that dominated the conference. In fact, a broader look into the climate change movement, if YouTube is a channel, produces videos upon videos of content (particularly TED related) by women on the subject of climate change. To a point where subjects such as ‘climate change’ and ‘women’ seem to have become strongly intertwined.
Climate change is very important. How can it not be? It involves the stability and future of the planet we call home. And any and all measures that can be taken to prevent it, provided they are based on solid research backed by facts (and not beliefs and feelings), should be taken. Provided of course these measures do less harm than good, today and in the long run. What I do find concerning, however, speaking of the COP26, and the broader debate on the subject of gender that seems to preoccupy the agendas of other global public gatherings of notoriety (the Davos World Economic Forum being another example), is that in recent times this topic tends to get married to other major social topics like the climate.
What is more concerning is the accompanying lack of attention on the status of men. MEN. You heard that right. The carrier of the XY chromosome. The one-half of the human species that, correct me if I am wrong, doesn’t seem to get the kind of attention, that females do. Especially in present times, when a day doesn’t go by when one does not hear some politician, celebrity, social activists of various stripes speaking on the topic of women, women’s rights, gender equality, and of course feminism. But when it comes to the subject of men, in the mainstream culture, there seems to be virtual silence. Wonder why?
On the point about the connection between climate change and women, one explanation is that these two subjects are connected at a deeper level, in a way that concerns that affect men aren’t. The problem however is that the growing preoccupation with ‘women’, has contributed, directly or otherwise to the lack of focus on men.
What is even more problematic is that this seemingly sycophantic obsession with promoting women’s rights, status in culture (e.g. House of Cards season 06) seems to form an unholy connection with the preponderance of voices, messages, themes, social commentary, and narratives coming out virtually all organs of mainstream culture that characterizes men in a negative light.
A cursory glance at popular culture shows modern movies, commercials, video games, commentary by politicians, to even books that present men as problematic, weak, and at best obstacles to the advance of women. Which in combination gives the indication that there is some mass cultural cynicism towards men. Making things more complicated is the use of rhetoric such as the “world is dominated by men”. A notion, to whatever extent it is true, combined with other factors, for the average guy following these developments, gives rise to a sense of disenchantment.
When speaking of ordinary men who are trying to find their way in their lives: study, work, grow spiritually, get laid/girlfriend, develop a meaningful career etc. Only to open up a magazine, read a news update, watch a movie or trailer, where the main or underlying message is one that is invariably antagonist into that which is male: By male, I am referring to that which is masculine, heterosexual and one could say traditional.
These days to be confronted by messages and themes that portray ‘men’ as bumbling incompetent fools (which is usually juxtaposed with the theme of the ‘all conquering female’), is not a new one. But then for these message to be muddled with theory of a “male-dominated society” adds to the sense of exasperation for men who don’t fall into either categories-‘dominators’ or losers-and do not wish to be associated with the latter.
Emotions aside, as a man one has to wonder what does all of this mean? My inference is that such conflicting messages, combined with the tough reality of life that most are faced with, leaves the average guy with a confused indifference towards life. The average man is not really bothered about who “dominates” society, for he is more preoccupied with everyday concerns like: economic security, physical health, meaningful relationships, a productive career and having an overall sense of stability in life.
So when men are confronted with the frequent and what I find to be increasingly systematic messages (given their preponderance) that portray men (all men presumably) as sexists, misogynists, haters, exploiters of ‘mother’ Earth’ or greedy sons of bi***es (Speaking of Wonder Woman 1984). Together can only have a demoralizing effect on men. Or at least contribute to a broader sense of disenchantment with the world around them.
So leaving aside the lack of societal concern for men as a sex, in relation to the endless attention that is showered on women and girls; there has been, to my mind, no serious attempt made at understanding the ill-effects produced by such social phenomena that presents men, at least in popular culture, in an overwhelmingly negative. The plight of man, that is the status of the average Joe, has garnered little attention in the public space. The objective of this essay, hopefully the first of many, is to engage this subject, and help moves this towards something constructive.
Do Men Really Dominate Society?
What is the plight of the average man today? To answer this question one ought to switch on the news (or update one’s news feed). Having done so, one is likely to encounter an article, news update, bulletin etc. Which would involve invariably two things: some heart breaking tragedy, conflict, cause of pain or in a word: evil. And two: when looks at the main victim(s) and perpetrator(s), the person or persons in question-in the latter where they are operating either as group or as part of some organization-they invariably happen to be male or be dominated by men.
To answer the question do men dominate society? One need only look at the numbers. Not the obvious ones that we are so used to whenever it involves any debate on gender (i.e. that which deals with the cream of society). One that is the routinely employed, usually for effect, as a way of showcasing the supposedly “sexist” character society.
The tiresome preoccupation with the percentage of female CEO’s of blue chip companies, as Heads of State, as Heads of Government, and in other key decision making bodies is a blatant simplification of the real disparities that exist between the sexes. If one wishes to look at the real numbers: the sort of statistics that deal with the plight of men as an entire group, rather than narrowly focusing on the achievements of a handful of men who rise to the top, we see a much different story. Here are some numbers outlining the status of men and women from two major countries in the world, between the years 2019- 2020.
|
U.S.A (Men) |
U.S.A (Women) |
U.K (Men) |
U.K (Women) |
Life Expectancy1 |
76.3 |
81.4 |
79.4 |
83.1 |
Number of Prisoners2 |
1, 322, 850 |
107, 955 |
78710 |
3830 |
Homicide Victims3 |
10,908 |
2,991 |
4294 |
241 |
Homelessness5 |
343,187 |
219,911 |
2,2776 |
377 |
As the numbers indicate men on average fare much worse than women across key indicators. Other indicators such as having a higher risk of developing cancer (men 2 in 1 vs 3 in 1 for women); the percentage of motor deaths (in the U.S men are almost 2.5 times more likely to be involved in road fatalities). When it comes to overall human well being, women tend to have it better than men on average. On average. Since much of the debate on gender in present times has revolved around improving the lot for ‘women’ rather than focusing on any particular group (besides ethnic and sexual minorities), the time has come to focus on the issues that affect men at the collective.
This is not a favored approach of mine. As I prefer looking at problems from the standpoint of the individual. But given what has transpired, on the character and trajectory of the debate on the gender, a broader approach is worth considering
Given that this facet of the debate on gender is coming in somewhat late in the day, it is worth looking at it bit cynically (or realistically). For the plight for most men across the world is a challenging one. One that does not involve the lifestyle of rich CEO’s, Professional Athletes, Politicians, Entrepreneurs of hot startups.
More often the plight men in most societies is one where there is a constant struggle to have or maintain the security of a well paying job, to own property, have and support a family, build social networks, and the search for status that is intrinsic to the spirit of man. Realistically the plight of many (a vast proportion of humanity if one considers the developing world) the life of man is verging on, if not close to being a Hobbesian one. A point which seems to be lost, for whatever reason, when ever the subject of the status of women is considered.
I guess it is understandable why gender activists would look at the men at the higher echelons of society and then look at their own (presumably mediocre state) and cry “sexism!”. To borrow from Robert Craft: Envy is an incurable disease. But maybe there is some truth to their indignation, which I do not yet understand. However the same argument can be advanced from the standpoint of men, who ‘dominate’ the lowest strata of society. Does not the plight of men who are left to occupy positions that are devoid of power, wealth and status and possibly hope, need a voice to speak up for them. Who is crying sexism over the plight of the powerless man. Given seriousness of the problem, given its universal nature, why aren’t enough people, or at least persons of importance speaking up about this?
A Leadership Vacuum
The challenges afflicting men today can partly be understood as a problem of leadership. Since there is no lack of information on the trials that men as a group are facing around the world, combined with the inordinate attention that has been given to the fairer sex, at a time when data on such issues are becoming more widely available and accessible; one must ask the question why has nothing been said or done about this divide. Men on average, I reiterate, with exception of gender selective abortion and female infanticide, stand to fair much worse in life.
A problem that is not unique to any particular country no matter its culture, religion, or politics. For example (another one, I know) according to peace women (the first search result on Google for this subject) one of two of the worst countries in the world for women to live in: Syria, women’s life expectancy was a full decade longer than that of men (78 to 67)7.
The reasons for this are straightforward: men go to war. In conflict women often stay behind, usually with the children. And speaking of the Syrian conflict, a 2015 piece by Aljazeera noted that 25 per cent of causalities were women and children8. Terrible. But what about the other 75 per cent? More could be said on this subject, but the numbers speak for themselves.
So I pose the question again: Why? Why is the plight of men not given a hearing. Why aren’t enough people (of importance) speaking about this. Why don’t we have global or public forums addressing the rampant inequality between the sexes. Including the various ways in which issues pertaining to gender are engaged: with respect to air time, resources, pro-female legislation, and speaking of the administration of a former U.S President, Executive Orders9. Why is so much attention and investment being directed towards the upliftment of women (all women presumably) but little to no attention being given to the plight of the vast swathes of men who simply do not make it in life.
In addition to those who end at the bottom of the pile (Not the same thing). Who is taking about the men in the middle: the group of men, notably those in adolescence to young adult range (ages 16-25) who are full of potential, energy and aspiration, but lack the kind of leadership that can propel them forward, to help them reach the great heights that they so desire. Where are the leaders, men or women (though I wouldn’t bet on the later) who can step up to become beacons for the younger generation of men, whose choice will come to shape our future (Despite the popular secular doctrine that ‘The future is female’).
Speaking of the key stage in life between the years 16-25: Which is a precarious but also opportune time. A time where the world seems like your playground, and nothing is beyond surmounting or conquest. But as the trials and challenges of life come, the future of hope and promise may seem distant. But provided the lad has a good head on his shoulders, a conducive external environment, with the right opportunities, some luck and importantly some good guidance he can pull through, and hopefully make it in life.
But realistically one ore more of these factors are not always present, and the pathway towards failure (often resulting from shortsighted, impulsive choices that become self-destructive in the long term). The plight of the one who is stuck in that middle, not knowing for certain where his future lies, in terms of his vocation and mission needs leadership. In some constructive form.
The absence of healthy leadership, preferably from men who have established themselves in life, the guys who have been there and done that, can prove to be the difference between success or failure. But ‘failure’ when it comes to men, falls on a spectrum. For in addition to the criminals, low-lifes and the homeless there are countless men who find themselves in an unenviable position, those who I would describe as ‘the invisibles’ of modern society: men who only manage to eke through life: Which includes the underemployed, the men who live on minimum wage; men who are burden with alimony payments, men who are trapped in an unhappy or abusive marriage; the men who wish to make something of their lives but are unable to do so. The many men who are unable to live a life of satisfaction, meaning and purpose. What about them?
Invisible Men
Leaving aside the factors and forces that have contributed to this state of affairs, which involves One: the weaker status of men as a group in relation to women, based on key social indicators, found across the world. Two: the lack of attention directed at these stark realities, exemplified by the virtual absence of voices in culture, most notably from those in positions of power (that are supposedly dominated by men).
So the questions are One: what can be done about the plight of men, who, when viewed as a collective, their status is quite bad? And Two: what can be done to raise awareness about these issues, that afflict possibly hundreds of millions of men around the world, so as to lay the ground work for initiatives to confront them.
If it must mentioned, I am not an activist. I don’t like activism. Which is a reason why I am uncomfortable with movements that seek to represent the rights and freedoms of one group, for in practice often means ignoring or downplaying the rights and freedoms of some other group or person. What is needed here is a wider conversation. One that seeks to engage the matters that affect men at the collective and at the individual level. At various stages of life, at various levels of society. With a key focus on what men want out of life: which is generally not the same as what the opposite sex seeks, especially as one moves up the Maslowian hierarchy.
For if one follows the present discourse on gender they seem to presented as the same. They are not. And interestingly enough, the relationship between ‘climate change’ and ‘women’ I suspect is an indication. Further, more attention needs to be given to areas where both sexes can work together.
The idea of advancing women’s rights, in practice tends to seem like a zero sum game. Feminism today, especially since the #MeToo ‘Times Up’ era, seems to become a movement that appears to be advancing a men vs women agenda. This is all speculation on my part, but really if humanity is to make the future a viable one where everyone can prosper, it requires the efforts, ideas and ingenuity of both men and women.
And when engaging the subject of men, it must mentioned that my focus is primarily on heterosexual men. I hope this is understandable. Whilst a lot of attention in recent years has been directed towards various rights groups, notably those which seek to define themselves via their sexuality or ethnicity. When it comes to sex, there has been a collective unease when it comes to looking at men as a single, monolithic group. Understandably so.
However I believe the time has come that men as a group be given a voice. And when I say that men matter, my focus is one the plight of heterosexual men. Those who makeup the vast majority of humanity, who today, as a collective have become invisible. Without leadership, without representation, without an identity. This does not mean gay men are to be ignored in this debate, but since men who identify with latter, and specifically those who base their identity on their queerness, have their own groups, social organizations of representation; which have publicized the concern of this subgroup over years, I am not considering them here. My focus is on men who identify themselves primarily as Men.
Conclusion- The Future is... Male
The epigraph used at the start of this essay: the notion of man being the measure of all things, has a number of different interpretations. One of the most notable being that the term ‘man’ is meant to connote the entirety of the human race. A sentiment which is reflective of the times in which the statement was formulated (Ancient Greece); where the status of women, notably in the social sphere was generally viewed as inferior to that of men. The statement was also meant to centralize the importance of man, as opposed to, or in opposition to God. A statement that carries hubris in terms of its rejection or at least antipathy towards the idea of a divine.
What standouts in a more positive light is its hyperbolic power: the wish to center man, or humanity, as the locus of human activity, with the goals and aims of life become centered on the here and now. In context of this debate (essay) the idea that man is measure of all things, is something that ought to be understood in relation to women.
Whilst much has been made of the need to advance the rights, status and power of women in the modern world, almost the entirety of this debate has been driven in relation to what men have done, what men have achieved, what men have accomplished, of how men are perceived in society. If anything the whole debate about advancing the status of women in the modern world (under the heading of “empowering women”), has fundamentally become an effort making trial to make women more like men.
Specifically the men who do well in society: the men who are wealthy, who wield power, who posses status and are recognized for their achievements. In the midst of this global drama, one that has been unfolding since, the mid 2010’s as far as I can remember, the plight of the powerless male who wishes to achieve and attain great things in life, but before that the ordinary things, the essential things.
The want to live a healthy, meaningful, purposeful life is the wish of almost every man. But it is one that is far fetched for far too many. So why this indifference towards the plight men. Why don’t the trials and tragedies that mark the life of tens of millions (if not more) men around the world, one that in aggregate surpasses the trials faced by women, overlooked by the power that be? Why?
References
World Bank. For the Year 2019.
Statista. For the Year 2019
FBI. Homicide Statistics for the Year 2019
ONS. The Numbers are for England and Wales only.
HUD. For the Year 2019
Homeless UK. Numbers for England only for the Year 2020.
World Bank. Life Expectancy at Birth For the Year 2019.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/9/29/25-percent-of-syrian-war-deaths-women-children.html
https://www.npr.org/2014/04/08/300477854/obama-s-executive-order-to-take-on-unequal-pay-for-women